|
|
Post your comments, queries or suggestions on CLAG's website here. If necessary, please indicate the particular subject area or CLAG page you are referring to in your comments. Owing to the number of spam bloggers posting here, please note I've recently had to disable the "Your website:" field for entries. Hopefully this disabling will prevent further spam blogging. (Genuine commenters can post their url if they feel the need to in the body of their message.) |
Back to CLAG home page | View guestbook | Sign guestbook
Number of entries: 21 Number of pages: 3
1 2 3
|
Next >
|
Last >>
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: David Elwyn From: Bedford E-mail: Contact |
The unknown gentleman behind the plant talking to Peter Squibb and Brian Clarke on the Dawn till Dusk page is Ivan Smith, of Southwark Bridge Models.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Barry Parks From: Britain E-mail: Contact |
Cambrian SR 25-ton brake van article: further to the box-out referring to alterations, the underframe mould is now in the process of having surgery. Namely: the solebar and headstock "depth" will be corrected; the w-iron height will be reduced and axlehole repositioned; the axleboxes will be moulded separately, with both SR & RCH types; if possible, a more positive location for the floor will be provided. The way the mould is being altered will allow shallower solebars & headstocks for the 15ton van to be made. This will be kit C95, out later this year. Barry Parks, Cambrian Models
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Russ Elliott From: London |
Many thanks Mattman - you're right! I'd got my 'L' and 'a' rather confused - diagram now corrected.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Mattman944 From: Florida, USA E-mail: Contact |
The picture referenced for the equations for "Overhanging load on beam constrained by two simple supports" appears to be incorrect. If a = 0, the deflection will be zero which can't be correct. I believe "L" should be the distance between the supports and "a" should be the overhang.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Ted From: Clag E-mail: Contact |
Re:tram drives Andrew, the axle-hung drive on the front page of The Site was developed with this problem in mind, but for 4mm scale. There are a lot of ifs, buts and maybes, which this comment page is not really suitable for. Please email the 'contact us' link, and I'll happily get back to you with lots more detail.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Russ Elliott From: London E-mail: Contact |
Andrew - if you look at, for example, the Pendlenton drive bogies page, there are examples there where outer or inner axles of drive bogies are driven. If driving on outer axles, the cardan will have to pass through the yaw axis (the pivot point) of the bogie, which will therefore require some extra ingenuity. Minimum deflections of the cardan axis will take place if the UJ pivot point is coincident with the bogie pivot axis. Such a UJ pivot axis will also be very close to where optimum bogie pitch and roll axes should be. For these reasons, driving on the outer axle via a cardan can provoke too many compromises on other suspension aspects - it really depends on how much longitudinal space one has and what kind of angular deflections of the cardan pieces you can tolerate. For 1:48 scale tram applications, axle-hung motors are likely to be a more attractive starting proposition, but since the driven axles are not mechanically linked (as they are with a central cardan arrangement), you will need to consider how best to connect (series or parallel) the motors electrically, and consider what effect a predominantly pulsed or predominantly non-pulsed electrical supply will have on the characteristics of those independent axle-hung motors.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Russ Elliott From: London E-mail: Contact |
Rob - I've added Ted's description of the way the buffers are sprung to the 'Kadees for Mk1 Coaches' page.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Ted From: Clag E-mail: Contact |
SPRUNG BUFFERS ON Mk1s Rob, the heads of the original buffers were cut off, and drilled to take 1mm styrene rod. Pushed right through and left overnight to dry, then finished on the face after. This rod was then sleeved to just inside the housing with plated brass tube, 1mm bore x 1.5mm od. This plating is not readily available now, but Finney and Smith do a tube of the same dimensions in stainless steel. Or you may be able to find the same in nickel silver. The existing housings were drilled 1.5mm sliding fit, and then capped behind the buffer beam with scrap styrene. Once dry (next day), a hole was started with a 1.5mm bit to centre the hole, then drilled through 1.0mm so as to retain the spring, a spare from Kaydee. These give a soft return. The anti-rotation guides were made up from scrap styrene, using a broach to make an adjustable interference fit between the rod and the anti-rotation peg.
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Andrew B. Middleton From: Australia E-mail: Contact |
The articles that have really caught my eye are those about the use of axle-hung & underfloor drive units using those micromotors!! I have (up to 1994) modelled trams in 1:48 scale, and am now doing some heavy "armchair modelling" regarding those drive units. Where one axle is driven on each bogie, I was told to power the outer axles, and have the drive shaft pivot under/over the bogie pivot point for best results. Any comments?
|
| Submitted by | Comments: | ||
| Name: Robert Bishop E-mail: Contact |
Hello, On the page labled 'Kadees for Mk1 Coaches', could you please explain how the sprung oval buffers were constructed and what parts were used? I also intend to use Kadee buckeyes between coaches, but I want a dropped buckeye with hook and sprung buffers for coupling to locos. Thanks, Rob Bishop
|
Powered by PHP guestbook 1.6 from PHPJunkyard - Free PHP scripts